LG vs Samsung Refrigerator: Which Should You Actually Buy?

If you are weighing up an LG vs Samsung refrigerator, decide the format first and the brand second. This page sets an LG model beside a Samsung model in three formats, using what each manufacturer publishes on its own India pages, plus the BEE label portal, read 29 and 30 September 2026. Where a page we read does not publish a figure, the table says so. Differences between figures are our own arithmetic from the published numbers.

The short answer. On published evidence, neither brand wins outright; the answer changes by format. Single door: the two Samsung models we compared carry the lower offer prices, but only the LG pages print an annual energy figure. Double door, about 250 L, 2 stars: each maker’s declared annual energy figure sits 2 kWh apart, and Samsung is about ₹400 cheaper, which is no real edge either way. Side-by-side: LG’s model is published at 546 kWh a year against Samsung’s 590; Samsung’s is about ₹10,300 cheaper. Warranty: 1 year on the product and 10 years on the compressor, parts only (LG: on selected models), from both. Both also state that the customer pays labour and gas charging on a compressor parts claim: LG for purchases from 1 August 2024, Samsung (“if applicable”) in the warranty card of the manual we read.

Single door, direct cool: two LG vs Samsung refrigerator pairs

All four models below are single-door direct cool. LG’s magazine (page dated November 2023) describes the type this way: “Direct-cool models rely on natural convection and may require manual defrosting when frost builds up.” If you are still choosing a type, start with frost free vs direct cool.

The 5-star pair

Capacity and stars match closely. Samsung’s page carries no kWh figure and no energy-label image, so there is no Samsung number to set beside LG’s 115. Samsung prints a stabiliser-free range of 100 to 300 V for its RR21H2G2 models; LG’s page says the model “Operates safely without an external stabilizer” and states no stabiliser-free voltage range. The 100 to 290 V figure on LG’s GLD1956 pages is the input range for a DC-to-AC converter, not a stabiliser range.

The 3-star pair

This pair is not capacity-matched. The LG is 27 L larger, so this is not a like-for-like price comparison. We found no LG 3-star product page between 183 and 190 L on the first page of LG’s single-door listing.

Double door, about 250 L

Samsung’s pages print no kWh text; both Samsung figures were read from the BEE label image on each product page. Neither Samsung page says whether the model is frost free, so we do not call it that.

The finding: no brand edge on declared energy at this size, on these models. At 2 stars, LG declares 233 kWh a year for its GLT2526XWDS and Samsung declares 231 for its RT40H30W2QHL. Two kWh is no edge either way. These are two makers’ declared annual figures set side by side, not a proven like-for-like grade, because Samsung does not state the defrost type. It is one pair of models, not a rule about either brand.

The second pair is not like-for-like: the LG is 1 star at 268 kWh, the Samsung 2 stars at 229 and 15 L smaller. That 39 kWh gap belongs to two particular models, not to a brand.

Samsung’s Twin Cooling Plus appears on its 330 L RT34HG5A23S8HL page, not on these two “All Around Cooling” models.

Stars do not cross types. The BEE label portal lists direct cool and frost free refrigerators as separate schemes. LG’s own numbers show why that matters: a 2-star 185 L direct cool at 170 kWh a year in LG’s catalogue (190 on one product page), against 233 for LG’s 2-star 251 L double door above, a type LG’s double-door pages describe as frost free. For the format choice itself, see single door vs double door.

Side-by-side: one pair

The label-series caveat. This Samsung label belongs to the 2023-26 series; the Samsung double-door labels above are 2026-28. A 2-star rating under one series is not the same threshold as under the other, and we do not hold the label series for LG’s model, so do not read LG’s 3 stars against Samsung’s 2 as a like-for-like grade. The published annual figures are 546 kWh for LG and 590 for Samsung, at almost the same capacity.

LG vs Samsung refrigerator warranty, from each brand’s own terms

Sources: LG India’s warranty-terms page and Samsung India’s warranty page, both read 30 September 2026, and the warranty card in Samsung’s RR21H2G24S8 user manual, read 29 September 2026.

What the headline numbers hide

Samsung’s compressor term was halved. For purchases from 1 December 2022 to 31 March 2026, Samsung’s policy gave 240 months on the Digital Inverter compressor; from 1 April 2026 it is 120 months. Anyone quoting 20 years is quoting the old tier. Samsung’s product pages match the new term: “10 year warranty is limited to the compressor only.”

LG’s 10 years is 1 plus 9, on selected models. The policy table prints “Compressor – 10”; the text says “The 9 Year warranty (Selected Model) on Compressor will continue even after expiry of 1 year period from the date of purchase.” The GLT2526XWDS page adds: “Additional costs other than the compressor may be charged(Labor, Other Parts, etc.)” Check the line on your model’s own page.

Both brands say who pays for gas and labour. LG: “From 1st Aug 2024 purchase both gas and labor amount to be paid by customer.” Before 31 July 2024, LG customers paid labour only. Samsung’s manual warranty card: “In case of parts warranty, labour cost and gas charging cost(if applicable) will be chargeable as per the applicable rates.”

LG publishes its repair-visit charges, applicable from 17 February 2026:

The cells print no currency symbol; an adjacent LG table prints “₹650 /-” for frost free up to 300 L, so we read these as rupees. Samsung’s out-of-warranty charge page loads its table in the browser, and we could not read it. That is a limit of what we could read, not evidence that Samsung publishes no charges.

LG vs Samsung refrigerator price bands, as of September 2026

Offer prices on each brand’s own storefront, 30 September 2026, for the models we have:

Compare offer with offer. LG’s pages also print an MRP well above the offer: on the GLT2526XWDS, the MRP was about 35% above the offer price as of September 2026 (our arithmetic). Set an LG MRP beside a Samsung selling price and LG looks dearer than it is.

What we could not verify

• Samsung single-door energy. Neither the RR21H2G25S8 nor the RR20H1723WR page carries a kWh figure or an energy-label image.
• Samsung double-door defrost type. The RT40H30W2QHL and RT40H28W2QHL pages state “All Around Cooling” and do not say whether the models are frost free.
• LG refrigerant. Not stated in the page text we could read on the nine LG refrigerator product pages.
• Samsung repair-visit charges. The table loads in the browser only.
• BEE star thresholds. We could not read the threshold tables from the BEE label portal.
• LG’s label series for the GL-B257HDS3.
• Service-centre counts. Neither brand publishes one on the pages checked.
• Reliability, noise and cooling evenness. We have no published data for either brand, so this page names no winner on them.

Where to Buy the Samsung RR21H2G25S8

Amazon India price on 31 October 2026, rounded to the nearest ₹100 (prices change often). This section covers only the one model listed; the other models compared on this page are not in it. As an Amazon Associate, HomeVerdicts earns from qualifying purchases made through this link.

Shopping on a budget of about ₹15,000? See Best Refrigerator Under 15000 in India (2026): 16 Models Compared.